Malevol3nt

No shes there, but when everyone else ain't.

http://48hrs.esknetlabs.com/index.php?showforum=1

Ulrich Schnauss - Nobody's Home.. ...perfect place? In Angelina Jolie's bed.

there's tech talk, there's spiritual talk, for everything else theres esknet. Seems allrite to me.

01. Ambience (April 14 2006).mp3 .. from the never released album.

So I gave a thought about this, I'm sure I'm not the only one who can "imagine" sound. For example I can think of a sound with my mind, such as a synth oscillator and think of it's characteristis like frequency, waveform etc. I can lay out a pattern in my head, and put it on repeat. I can then mimic effects that I know of such as reverb, pitch effects and flanger, there's lots of others aswell like gates etc. One I have the most trouble with is delay. I can't really set my mind to immitate a delay on a loop that I'm thinking of in my head. I guess it's a bit too complicated (for my brain) to calculate time delays hehe. Still tho, I can do some weird stuff like fast tempo slowdowns or speedups, glitchy effects etc. And this is all while I'm imagening the loop in my head. It gets even more fun when I take a part of a song I allready know of. Then I can imagine what it would be like if I put some effects on it, or if I change it's frequency etc. It's really fun to do. Edit: Now that I think of it, I pretty much do this all the time. For example when I listen to a minimal track that doesn't have alot of changes, I think inside my head how it would be like to put in a sound in there. This is all while the track is playing. I can even simulate an effect over the entire track (such as a flanger) and thus enjoy the track even more. Anyone else like to experiment with their "inner sequencer"?

Does anyone know of any melancholic/sad online radios/streams? I've tried googling but surprisingly couldn't find any. Isn't there something out there? Any genre btw.

On his myspace page, under the comments. That comment was from early '08 tho. Myspace Link Quote:

Another problem I think is when you don't listen to music chronologically. For example someone might be used to the music from the past few years, and the releases from the 90s might sound vague and plain, without any differences. I think it's only a first impression of the listener, if he would dive into and try to play some of that music for a longer period of time he would eventually start to appreciate it.

Some Psylent Buddhi stuff, really enjoyin it. Linky

Enjoying the tunes, some wicked stuff you got there. Looking forward to your possible new productions.

Powernet is a pretty good place. But I listen to their ambient stream more often then the psy stream. Here's the linky: http://radio.powernet.bg/

Just checked his myspace, this one is to keep an eye on in the days coming imo. Talented little guy for sure! The name "Antares" rings a bell tho, I might of had some of his older mp3s somewhere.. gotta look. Edit: And I wasn't far off, dragonfly records has their eyes on him allready. Hehe

NO! Not while I'm so close to 3k anyway Edit: So what happened with the sepperate review areas idea? Droped?

I think I've found your cook!

Both statements are okay. It's like center vs centre. American english vs uk english I think..

Well I guess it has to do with if you're trying to make an album which contains tracks that fit into one category, for example only tribal dark psy tracks and you want them to be grouped as a whole album, or tracks of a certain theme, maybe an album where the tracks progress into one another so they're connected and are better this way then releasing individually. It's all up to personal taste. Edit: Plus, releasing an album (free of charge) is a good way to promote your music. Altho yeah, you could release individual tracks on comps for netlabels aswell.

I actually like the idea. Member Promos & Demos sounds about right. At least it will keep members from posting their tracks in the music making section (this is often the case) & record labels posting in music promo.

Well, yeah. But there's really a diversity of goa artists that you can hear from the 90s, altho alot of these new artists of today keep focusing on just "one sound". Surely there are some general rules to follow when making a goa track, but there should be more then just one approach towards these rules. I mean look at the diversity of AP, Man with no name and Hallucinogen. All 3 are very different from each other but yet they've all made goa. So it's not a really tight set of rules that should allways be followed.

Well when he says the stuff like "I think that way too few artists used good chopping probably because they lacked the ability to produce great choppings.".. Ever considered that doing the same shit over and over again just makes your music sound the same? Maybe other artists tried to be original and come up with something other than chopping their tracks? If everyone started using it, it would end up the same as psytrance ended up with the bassline feaver. Everyone just had to put that bassline in the front and forget about the rest of the track. The point is you can't put a recepy for music. Because if you do, everyone will cook the same (ADDING GARLICK TO IT ISN'T GONNA CHANGE SHIT! )

As far as I know the "Another World" album by AP was one of the most selling trance albums of all time? I know I've read this on a bunch of sites. Emphasis on trance, not goa trance. So that's a more widespread marketing area. I've yet to find out what the real number of sales is.. am curious really.. if the statement is true of course.

ga2pir stop talking to the mirror in front of you.

Files? You want more files? Try utorrent!

You mean that's not photoshopped?! Oh boy..

Agent Six-Oh-Four enteres the restaurant and awaits the waiter: Agent: My name is Posford, Simon Posford. Waiter: Good evening, Sir. Would you like some appetizer before you order dinner? Agent: Yes, a slice of '87 Mónperée cheese. Chopped, not gated!