yeah well, what can you say?
people could argue schumacher was better? - he was very technical and focused, but senna always had the edge
prost? - good driver, but not as consistent, and had alot of luck go his way - didn't deserve 4 world champs
lauda, mansell, andretti, fangio, rosberg the list goes on, they all extremley good drivers, but didn't have the package
senna was king in the wet, for pole position, could win in crap cars/underpeforming, could pass in parts where it shouldn't be possible, had the balls to do so (sometimes when he shouldn't have, japan 89 i think)
he was the perfect driver, u put any driver in the comp now up against someone like that, no show, only schumacher of recent years could keep up! imo of course.