Jump to content

Kryll

Members
  • Posts

    941
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kryll

  1. what's your point ? dont understand why u make such a fuss about it people asking for rips... or you react out of interest (trade?) or you ignore people giving rips for free: no problem for me, as long as i'm interested in the music i go for it people sharing rips only to people that promise not to share further on p2p.. now there i hear ya but i can't be bothered with it and why call people names just because they trigger irritation in you ? so... what's the point u are trying to make ? are u looking for personal opinions on ripping ? or what ?
  2. using flipped curver boxes overhere they'll do for now hehe
  3. try Xingu Hill - Maps of the Impossible legal download
  4. looks like a safe setup (regarding high frequencies for the 4 speakers) but don't have any knowledge or experience when it comes to that (mid to high) speakers have an angle of 45° where they give most power, so i guess placing them in the top with an angle downwards would maximize the effect, and lower the amount of first reflections via the ceiling and side walls
  5. if u have them floorlevel, try to put them in an angle so they're aimed a bit upwards if u have an open space between you and the speakers, then you only have a minor difference problem is that high frequency's are too directional every object that stands in between the speakers and the listener will act as obstacle for high frequencies high freq = short wavelength -> so they reflect on objects low freq = long wavelength -> they can wave around objects low frequencies (50 till 200 Hz) are undirectional, so they fill the room high frequencies are directional, the source of these can be clearly distinguished having high frequencies placed at a height between ears and chest (imo) give the cleares and most direct sound plus you have a better resonance of the lower frequencies (as i experienced) it seems that woofers on groundfloor speakers lose a bit of fullness or something
  6. home listening.. ? well.. i have only my headphone i use for mixing it has tiny fitting ear-cups, so doesn't have good accoustics on the low freq's my speakers are still in reparation (troubles with the wiring or servo's it seems) for home listening: i'd prefer a headphone with large ear-cups, a massive sennheiser for example, with a very long wire but some music just doesn't work on headphones... a good stereo setup widens up the sound, giving it more space to move in so it depends if u choose a headphone for home listening id go for things like these: if u want speakers for home listening, be sure NOT to put them on the floor best is to place them at a height where the tweeters are about the same level as your ears, or just a bit lower
  7. yeah, ofcourse but what's the difference in format between a audio-CD-R and a audio -CD ? i mean, purely falking bout the format here i never use mp3's for mixing, not even legal ones
  8. Favorite format of music ? physically probably: Brains+Memory Slots+ etc.. etc... etc... .. Vinyl Pressings are the closest resemblance to this sound, so Vinyl = first in line for a preferred intermedium digitally ? i dont care as long as i don't lose any vital details from the tracks... if i want quality or in case of cd's something physically and visually as extra, in addition to the lossless encoded audio, i'd choose to buy a (imho) worthless CD-copy sold for overpriced amounts (as it percieved it's value in cash from the ol'LongPlayer, but then the 80 minutes-long type the whole production-process for one cd within a larger grouped amount of thousands - i was told - costed about 60 to 80 eurocents per copy (artwork-printouts and evryth.included) and it kinda shows in its appearance for me in physical value (imho), only Vinyl in the first place, cd's just carry a financial value, and a musical(-data-)value.. everything here is engineered to make an infinity of copies with the cheapest materials still conforming with the CD-standards)
  9. are you talking in terms of white and black, and just gave a white example ? i don't think there's alot of grey involved in this in these times it mostly tends to be black, or dark grey *edit* ah yes, forgot to mention.. propaganda doesn't exist much longer than the beginning of 20th century ...
  10. High-dilly ho Neighbourino's ! ah yes.. also against the music + religion stuff i dont go to parties to convert into some kind of belief (be it religiously or politically or nutritionally oriented) u know what comes from mixing up art and beliefs (it is called PROPAGANDA)
  11. if u want church-choir samples Try Juno Reactor - Transmissions and X-Ray - Requim
  12. Stoornis is definately worth a check
  13. may i know for what particular reason ? and what u want to do with it ? i'm not allowing random ownership based on monetary quantities
  14. it's quite a farmers/greenzone here not really enough material around to experiment with it, tried a brick once, pulvered it and layered it over my sheet with tobaccers.. but i guess those rugget cemented ones are much more of a kick
  15. on the rocks.. always on the rocks unless it's a good single malt
  16. who's Timbaland ? was nelly furtado not doing some works/projects with Justin Timberlake ? well anyways... prolly wrong thought but who is this Timbaland ?
  17. checkin' her fangs out in the mirror
  18. so you're saying that rating is subjected to a certain amount of subjectivity ?
  19. gave it another listen it's quite a hard intro imo.. that sudden kick+snare also quite a static and stretched feeling break/kick/rhythm that's patterned too much in blocks like as with dancefloor material too static and minimal for such a soundsphere imo i'd rather build it up more graduately and adding percussion one by one while you're building up the atmosphere as for example setting a tempo (with a baseline or a background beat/break or sth else) before setting a rhythm .. u know building up a structure based on how the soundsphere evolves.. something like that so that the rhythm works as a drive for the soundsphere to evolve/flow on also (near-silence) is a strong medium to work with but okay, that's my vision on it, i'm not saying how it's done or something i'm a rookie when it comes to producing hehe anyways.. only thing i can say is that making it more dynamic could give you more options to build out a more extensive structure definately not waste bin material .. just trying to give remarks that might be usefull
×
×
  • Create New...