Jump to content

aliendna99

Banned
  • Posts

    516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by aliendna99

  1. ^ 3/5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BbC52LN-GE meh why wont the link embed?
  2. Shiva Space Technology had some pretty cool japanese stuff in the late 90s
  3. i dont listen to it very often but when i do its X-Dream - Thorazin (masterpiece) Planet BEN - Schleiffer (also awesomeness)
  4. i am a goatrance connoisseur but I cant find this track. It begins with a simple intro to climax into a frenetic acid line ,where the focus is that very acidline. similar how juan domi jorg - spiritual healing has an intro, that climaxes into a 100% focus of the mainline. It is a very simple track as I remember it. any suggestions will be appreciated. It was heard in 98-00 time period
  5. the track at 08:00 is Wizzy Noise - Dark City just as Draeke suggested
  6. again im extremely impressed with your reproduction, Padmapani. Would love to work with you someday anyhoo, I guess this concludes the spiritual healing, since we both did a very okay job. I will now start a new tune which is open for contest I will also try and of course I havent started already and am not cheating. I will select this one (just cause of the sheer impossibility to recreate it, I sure as hell wont succeed) : http://picosong.com/RvYf/ Cosmosis - a line from moonshine oh and for extra bonuspoints; the bassline also please
  7. hello again this is the subtractor, not sure what to tweak to get it to sound more accurate. think i might have to try another synth http://bayimg.com/lAOGkAAEf and here is a soundclip i made with kick, bass etc just for the hell of it not very good, didnt spend much time on it hehe. http://picosong.com/RWfz/
  8. And yes koxbox album is pretty good too
  9. Hey My memory is failing me What is the track called... It might be the xdream people. Something like fairy dragon tales Help me ppl It's a classic just ccan't remember the name atm
  10. It is most likely your mixer then. The 0 on your mixer is probably more like -12 then. In any case just peak normalize and be happy OP,
  11. and yes, to hopefully end the thread go ahead and peak normalize to 0, its fine and will not decrease in quality
  12. No. I know it is a wave file. What I mean is the picture doesnt make sense to me. It should go to a maximum ceiling of 0db. http://bayimg.com/eAohIaAEe Your screenshot shows something wierd in my opinion. The above picture is a sample of a track with very little dynamic left, and is probably very loud, with estimate of about -7db average rms. Unmastered it should look entirely different, something like this http://bayimg.com/EAohlAaee as you can see there is plenty of dynamics left. These are just pictures i googled, because I am not home and could not provide any more accurate pictures atm, but I believe you get the idea. so I hope you know realise what I meant when I said I was confused by your screenshot. also, -13,8db rms seems a little bit too low imho. If played on a radio it will be very noticably lower in volume comparably
  13. I am not sure I am understanding the screenshot . I've never used auadicity but it looks strange to me. Could you try again maybe a bit more zoomed in? Also the wav seems centered around zero where 1.0 is the ceiling. That is also Wierd because the ceiling should always be 0 as anything above that is clipping. So I'm not sure what the numbers there mean. And could you check the rms after normalizing.
  14. Then in your case I would just normalize peak to - 0.01 and smile and be happy and think nothing more of it. Could you do me a favor though, after you normalize, could you please analyze the wav for the average rms value. I am a little worried that either your equipment or auadicity thinks that - 12db actually is -0db. If this is the case there is not a real dynamic and the issue is real and should be fixed. I'm not sure you understand what I mean it's difficult to explain. Could you also take a screenshot of the raw wave before you touched it? It's quiet easy to spot if it looks okay
  15. It being 24bit rather than 48bit (which I never even heard of before) makes a lot more sense. Regarding the - 12db "issue" it is most likely just as dolmot describes it. This is not bad at all, but rather quite good as it leaves a lot of dynamic headroom for mastering. As i understand it your "issue" is that the highest peak is at - 12db correct? ( My mixdowns are usually around the - 15db (rms) mark to give enough room for mastering where the final product is something like -8db rms. Max peak is something like -2db before and - 0.01db when finished. ) It could also just be something you have overlooked in your settings.
  16. There is a huge difference between normalizing peak vs. normalizing rms. You could use 32bit also if you want but personally I wouldn't. Seems unnecessary. If you want absolute quality you must convert the bitrate from 48 to 24 Before it enters auadicity. For that you will need an extra peice of equipment. Couldn't you set your equipment to work in 24bits instead of 48 btw? Either way it's all just for peace of mind the end result will be the same to something like 99.99999% And it will definitely not be any audible difference in the end result at 44 kHz / 16 bit. (cd master)
  17. It is perfectly safe to normalize. I don't even think any algorithm is used that is unique to the different waw editors. It just puts the max peak of the wav to whatever db you choose thus increasing volume. Normalizing the rms (or loudness) is another story. Audacity will receive a 24bit signal. It doesn't convert it from 48. It just cuts or removes the data from 24 to 48. (kinda the same as writing 0 in that data range) You will most likely not lose any quality doing this since the audio data is 16 bit to begin with making it very unlikely that there is any data in the 24-48 bit range anyway.
  18. Thanks for sharing! You definitely got really close to the original. My hats off to you. I am out of town the next few days so I will soon post my settings
  19. Mindfield - let's get stoned and watch the freaks Didn't know what goa was never heard anything like it Kinda forgot about it, Then several years later Juan domi jorg - spiritual healing remix Hallucinogen - gamma goblins part 2
  20. Ok i reread it twice. Not sure what the question is. Are you asking if audacity lowers the quality? Then no, it doesn't
×
×
  • Create New...