Rotwang

A lot of people seem to rate Psykovsky very highly. Personally I find his stuff a bit hit-and-miss; some of it is brilliant, some of it is boring. I don't have the album, but based on the saikosounds samples I would do, yes.

If you're asking who the Hallucinogens of darkpsy are, then Kindzadza is surely one of them: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMlbQzOFbO0

Can I resist the temptation to lock the thread after this post?

^ What's with the suits?

Makes me think of .

That's fab.

Sounds like the kind of thing I'd do.

Here's me, second from right: What do you look like?

^ Yes it rules.

I've not had a chance yet, their phonelines are too busy to take any more calls. Guess I wasn't the only person they screwed over yesterday.

Ordered from discogs (allegedly factory sealed):

I guess both our Mothers got fuck all for Mothers day. But at least your fuck all was free.

So does Kurt.

About to phone Interflora to ask them why the fuck they didn't deliver any fucking flowers to my Mother like I fucking paid them to. Also, Yay! OT is back.

Looks pretty awesome.

If you don't mind me asking, how come?

Ironically, Duke Nukem Forever is now taking preorders (really). The third Hallucinogen album has officially outlived the Duke Nukem Forever joke. That's quite an achievement.

I don't have any constructive criticism to give you, but I did like it a lot.

Personally I agree that trainwrecking with trance is bad, but I think it's a bit silly to suggest that GG's doing so killed psytrance (not least because psytrance is not dead). BTW, djmaxfactor1995: may I suggest not top-posting? Your replies would be easier to follow if you wrote them below the quoted material to which you are replying.

Yes, I KNOW. This still doesn't contradict Abasio's statement.

None of the material you quoted had any bearing whatsoever on what Abasio wrote. Do you have any evidence that his comment was inaccurate? So does Abasio.

I believe it's from here.

Is it good?

No. If you're talking about a mathematical proof that GR predicts the existence of black holes, that was proved by Roger Penrose, not Hawking. If you're talking about a scientific proof that black holes really exist, there is no such thing. Hawking radiation is a different topic altogether.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPbxeweNeLw Dunno if that's the kind of thing you're looking for but it's the only one that springs to mind right now.