chill bill

imo bluetech tried to get an warmer style but he failed and the result is a faceless album without any climaxes and no soul. a big step back compared to his previous two albums. the music sounds cold and too digital.

very nice name for a chillout compilation!

feel the same, the album is quite uninspired and a big disappointment. dont know how bluetech could produce such meaningless stuff after the first two album which were very good.

smashin pumpkins !

i dont like the album at all! the previous one is much better and warmer! obviously bluetech tried to get an warmer stlye with this album (becoz all said his stuff sounds no warm enough) but the result is imo the opposite. after listening to the album i felt quite bored and imo its not a step forward. the sounds and strutures of the trax are faceless and quite boring, the atmosphere of the trax is too melancholic and sad for me, sorry. same with the cover artwork . i prefer more the first release, elementary particles which is a masterpiece!

vibrasphere rmx is killaaarghh! most best!

imo best ticon album ever! very modern and sometimes quite electro! great work!

damn right !

its funny that the people who wants to be the most mind-open ones are the less ones. you´re all want to be soooooooo mind-open and psychedelic that that you even not realize that you´re actually the most small minded. tolerance! sorry for that, but its fact when i read all the comments here.

Human Blue´s new album is just great!

its to be released in two weeks! cant wait!

the best electro is directly out of the power socket, trust me!

no map needed, but exact place!

yeah the picture who shows moni doing 4 things at the same time! could be great coverartwork!

you´re suffering under typical german pessimism ... god bless you! :lol: :lol: :lol:

great, supermoni ... dont forget me to send the picture! i´m really curious about how does it looks for sure, fosters or german beer? where is womania, be prepared i´m coming!

your a funny sweetie what else shall she do on the cover, balancing a ball on her nose? preparing a spliff or zapping tv? she´s holding the microphone ... she´s communicating ! ... in the moment in the passive way because the 2nd women behind with the megaphone is active talking. but my congrats to you if youre able for multitasking and doing all three things mentioned above plus listening to a conversation to the same time! btw, if you can .... can you send me a photo of the situation?

seems that you all here still didnt understand the story of the cover ... i ask my self is it just lack of imagination or is it lack of intelligence? 1. the flower is not a flower, its a megaphon with a blossom on the end megaphone = speaker ... = dialogue of the speakers. 2. in the background a 2nd women with a megaphon is to see, that gives the impression that they communicate together ... = dialogue of the speakers. 3. since a megaphon nowadays does not fly in the air around by itself its hold by the women. btw, the women is not just a women, she is the person who is mentioned in the story inside the booklet. seems the story of the cover is too complex for some of you? its not too difficult!

dont sell it for that cheap price, i saw one copy sold last week on ebay for 137 euro!

you´re wrong, you´ll hear plenty of shpongle there!

yes, the label closed down and is not longer existing because of financial reasons caused by a distribution which went bankrupt!

the sentence "It's not refreshing to use naked or semi-naked women on covers since the product has absolutely nothing to do with that. It's a down right pathetic and obsolete way of marketing." you answered to lawrencetaylors statement about the entheogenic cover. also your sentence "It's not refreshing to use naked or semi-naked women on covers since the product has absolutely nothing to do with that." gives me the impression that you meant the cover. i just wondered about that someone could find that sexistic. ??? but if you meant with " I hardly doubt that any inlay text could save that cover" the buckle up cover then its really a missunderstanding coz i think also even the best text cannot save the cover

sorry, i think you mixed up the things. we talk about the entheogenic cover! i didnt meant the buckle up cover in all my posts!

i can see no ass and to single tit on the cover, where please you see that?

when you say "covers with women that were actually presented as sluts" ..... where is for you the difference/definition between covers where womens are shown like here in an aesthetic way and material where womens are presented with pussies?