chiragkotak Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 hi... recently i was trying to upload a track to the net and i read in the agreement that no copyright material allowed... i took a few voice samples of a dvd and used it on that track...and decided not to upload it.... i was just wondering what the system is?? i hear alot of professionally released tracks with various voice samples from movies.... do they get permission for that??? how about if the sample is tweaked till unrecognisable... like pitch shift etc... thanks... Quote
Ormion Posted March 14, 2005 Posted March 14, 2005 I don't believe it! I was about to ask th esame question! I'm curious about it also Quote
ericflyer Posted March 16, 2005 Posted March 16, 2005 Oficially you have to get an autorisation, if not they can sue you. Though nobody will do anything against you unless you sell a great amount 50 or even over 100.000 albums. Quote
Guest Rain Posted March 17, 2005 Posted March 17, 2005 Oficially you have to get an autorisation, if not they can sue you. Though nobody will do anything against you unless you sell a great amount 50 or even over 100.000 albums. 230889[/snapback] true the day your tracks is played on mtv everybody knows but here in the psy scéne we don't have that problem yét... still I believe there is a difference betwees sampling films of music tracks... but again I always say It depends of the law in which country... there isn't an international law about such a subject so Quote
Basilisk Posted March 17, 2005 Posted March 17, 2005 Any year now psytrance producers are going to begin to get creative until then, more hollywood. Quote
Cybernetika Posted March 18, 2005 Posted March 18, 2005 I dont understand what a big movie firm should have against samples in music. I mean, if I hear a cool sample in a tune I might even get some interest in the movie that sample is taken from. I dont know why the firms should lose any money by the artists indirectly promoting their movies. Quote
Guest Rain Posted March 18, 2005 Posted March 18, 2005 I dont understand what a big movie firm should have against samples in music. I mean, if I hear a cool sample in a tune I might even get some interest in the movie that sample is taken from. I dont know why the firms should lose any money by the artists indirectly promoting their movies. 231677[/snapback] true that's my opinion too but then again kapitalims think in profit perspective and wants money when there's money to collect if you know what I mean... they don't think in losing money but in winning money Quote
ericflyer Posted March 18, 2005 Posted March 18, 2005 I dont understand what a big movie firm should have against samples in music. I mean, if I hear a cool sample in a tune I might even get some interest in the movie that sample is taken from. I dont know why the firms should lose any money by the artists indirectly promoting their movies. 231677[/snapback] In most cases they don't own the music but only license it. So the artist/label/ publisher who owns it would sue you. Quote
Cybernetika Posted March 18, 2005 Posted March 18, 2005 true that's my opinion too but then again kapitalims think in profit perspective and wants money when there's money to collect if you know what I mean... they don't think in losing money but in winning money 231681[/snapback] Sad but true Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.