Jump to content

AmithabaBuddha

Members
  • Posts

    694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AmithabaBuddha

  1. Sorry, but frankly I think you could do with trying to do a track or two in Logic or Cubase.

    That track could sure be both be more distinct in the kick and bass and less messy in the mids and top.

     

    What are you using for monitoring?

    224265[/snapback]

    monitor headphones. :) the track needs some proper mastering too , ive mastered it a bit but im not so good at mastering so thats your answer ;)

    thanks for the warning spin , im grateful for it , maybe you could give me an hand on preproduction... :)

  2. Very nice!

     

    Listening to your new works from time to time is like growing flowers =) More time passes - more beautiful they get ;)

     

    More mature stuff now... but there still is a great way to go, remember that!

    224266[/snapback]

    thank you so much for the kind words :D

    yes we are growing all the time ;)

    thanks :)

  3. short answer but more later... I really don't like people who say such a thing like goa is dead,

     

    Goa didn't die... When people complain about the fact that the spirit is gone, and that it isn't not like it was used to be then it's just their individual experience... And it's not fair to set such a feeling as a generallity...Newcommers within the scéne feel the same euphorial connection like I had 5 or 6 years agoo... the music changes off course but mostly the individual perspective how you experience the scéne changes a lot influenced by the longer you got to goaparties... And then again it's not that fullon is more present that all the goatrance created before is lost... there are still new releases like filteria, ypsilon 5, ethereal... so goa as music will not die...

     

    There are still outdoor festival with perfect sunrises in the morning, beatifull lakes, parties in the forest... I think goa has never been so much present before... In my country there a like 2 goa parties every weekend.... And trust me belgium is a small country...

     

    I think in the future we will see goa rise as a global matter with al his subgenres.... The time of rock is over and electronic music concured the world... And trust me goa will be one of thé electronic explosions in this age... Even old skool will have his come back not to worry...

    224249[/snapback]

    SunTrip is working on an upcoming party and they´re planning me to Live Act on it , so i expect you to join it. Belgium is starting to be the new "Goa" i presume ;)

  4. Hello everyone ,

    after 5months of planning and sweating a lot finnaly something was done.

    I´ve founded my new Goa-Trance project.

    I want to invite everyone to listen to the teaser of my new single.

    The track is done , im planning to release it somewhere , maybe it will be released by SunTrip but nothing is confirmed.

    For more info about the project check the site and the teaser is avaiable too.

    Feedback about my new project is welcome too.

    Cheers everyone.

     

    Myst

  5. er... no. I have melodic trance from way before the term "goa trance" was formed. Trance as a genre description for certain electronic dance music was first used in the late 80's, and I challange you to find any reference to goa trance that is older.

    224239[/snapback]

    i was wrong then , thanks for correcting me :)
  6. have u ever used logic or cubase?

    if not how can u say that the sound quality is the same?

    u have to try both before u can assure that the sound quality is the same..

    i did a test with a some friends of mine who wanted to get into music...

    i showed them reason and then logic, and they told me that now they understand what the difference is, it's mostly in fatness of sound and more accurate reproduction of what is going on...

    and btw u don't have to use logic or cubase with hardware, u can use vsts only and the logic's synths for ex... more than enough to make good music...

    224196[/snapback]

    No.

    listening to records that were made on it.

    Using huge program just to use software isnt reliable for me and those programs eat lots of cpu sources.

    i dont say those programs arent good , ou contraire my friend are very good , but i dont i need them cause i the tools i use are enough. ;)

    thats all. :)

  7. I always say...

     

    the difference between a trance wave & goa trance wave is:

     

    trance wave : one sound going up & down like very big fish swimming in the ocean....

     

    goa trance wave: are like thousand little fishes who are together as big like that one big fish and al moving in the same direction just like the big fish swims into the ocean... that's why you can have tales with goa sounds... Some fish can be ahead of the group and other are rather late... but you can all here them...

     

    that's what makes goatrance psychedelic in my own dreamy opinon  :D

    224178[/snapback]

    let´s go fishing then :P
  8. That's my point. You can't create a good track with ONLY FL. Fl rewired to Reason, YES.

    Btw you say they all sound the same... i ask: 1) what are the compression/equalising capabilities of FL? of Reason ? of Cubase or Logic ? :D

     

    Also, i'd be glad to listen to some of your tracks...

    224164[/snapback]

    yes i admit at least for me its impossible to make Goa only with FL , the sampler is no good , nothing compared with the Reason´s samplers. In Reason i use pads , choirs , real sounds so that you can feel it Real. FL isnt good in multisampling , unless you just want to use a single note on the note sampled sample.But there other cons in Reason , for example Fruity 5 haves a extremely good granulizer. :) Like i told before , FL its almost just the tool. I just throw it some VST and thats it.

    well cubase and logic are very good , most of the people likes the way of its sequencing and work methods. Cubase and Logic are programs developed specially for hardware (not software studios like Reason and Fruity).Thats why i dont use them , and besides the soundquality is the same i can assure you.

    Well for EQuing/compression i´d say FL is much better than Reason since you have more freedom on the chain Fx section. Reason is kinda limited in that way , but if you tweak Reason the right way with those parametric EQ and compression im sure youll get a good sound.

    Since i just use my computer as DAW (digital workstation) the proper programs to work with is FL and Reason.

    :)

  9. i didnt say fruity & reason. i said fruity only.

    i am aware of the fact the you can create very kewl songs even with FL, but with Reason 3 it will be almost sure.

    As far as the stoneage thing is concerned: It's true that software is getting more and more popular but more guyz use hardware, even some new artists[e.g visit Filteria's studio @ www.filteria.com  He combines hardware synthesizers with Logic on his mac]

    224161[/snapback]

    ok mate ;) sorry heh. even reason 2.5 is killer , so 3 will be even more killer with that mastering tools :)

    to me software is much better than hardware.why?

    1st-more fast and easy to program

    2nd-no need to be rich to buy real machinery (that applies to me)

    3rd-more room space

    4th-its digital , it never loses quality whatever are the circunstances.

    5th-no cable wires confusing

    6th- and so on.......

     

    I´m sure Filteria haves his methods but im another person , so by Nature im different ;) .

     

    Virtual Analog synths (yes VST´s are virtual analog , at least Synth1 is.) can sound a little bit different of real analogue , can sound more crispy and clean , but digital is about quality isnt it? it takes a lot of time to get the sound a producer wants , but thats what producing is about , taking lots and lots of time in front of the computer trying to figure it out whats good and whats not good.

    I just have a Pentium 4 at 2.4 Ghz , my midi controller quite old but good (Evolution MK-149) , Audiorealim bassline (this VST is authentic to the real TB-303 , the sound is authentic , nothing can beats it) , Synth1 , a great freeware synth , FL (Sequencer) and Reason. Im working in my new project and maybe it will be released soon. Style is Goa-Trance as always and keep checking SunTriprecords.com for more further info. :)

  10. well.. the eternal fight...

    i used to use reason myself for like a year...

    then i moved to logic... it's true u can make good tunes with reason or fruity loops, but logic or cubase just has a better sound.. it is undeniable...

    the sound is fatter, heavier, while the sound coming out of fruity or reason has this software sound to it...

    so amithababudha and the others who think reason or fruity is as good as logic or cubase, just get a copy of either one of them, make some tunes with it for a few weeks, and then come back and tell me which is better...

    i mean why on earth would all the major acts in the scene (hallucinogen, infected, gms, talamasca and countless others) use logic or cubase if fruity or reason was just as good?? doesn't make any sense to me...

     

    i think the pb is when people who use fruity or reason hear that those pgms r not as good , they think we are saying that their music is not good... that's not what people are saying... i heard some of ur tunes amithababudha and i think u definitely has some talent, but i am telling u if u move to logic or cubase u will improve ur production...

    224153[/snapback]

    dont need to mate ;) the technique is in me , the program already offers me all the stuff i want.

    This kind of discussion is pointless. all the programs sound the same. i agree that fruity´s synth arent good , i dont use them at all , i use synth1 and audiorealism bassline and then Reason rewired into FL. so the point here is FL is pratical , simple , direct to the point and fast so i use it as a sequencer/VST host to my productions. :)

  11. but I don't know if you're beginning, maybe you're a pro  :lol:

    fruity: positive: easy to learn your instrumental skillz, entertaining, quick, lots of creative freedom,

              negative: sound sucks, but is that important for beginners? no!

    cubase: positive: kick ass sound

                negative: slow creation=>simplistic creation, frustrating for beginners. Only for pro musicians

    224057[/snapback]

    sorry beeing to harsh on this answer but if your song in fruity sound bad its you thats sounds bad not the program.

  12. It's not bullshit... Certainly, FL doesnt have the same quality as Cubase... That's for SURE>. Just see all the features cubase has.... IT's no point arguing...

     

    Btw, have you seen any well-known artist using  fruity ? NO. Many of them combine their hardware with Cubase or Logic however...

    223903[/snapback]

    we´re not in the stoneage , so nowadays almost every producer uses software.

    and yes you will see a well-known artist that works with fruity and reason. That person is me.

    Take care.

  13. psytrance is about the feeling , and now that doenst exist for most of the called "psytrancers". and i make ukiros words my words too about the technical stuff. the melodies cut in gaps make a shortcircuit in my brain , the spacey layers (about the reeverb you were right) and lots of Tb-303 sounds :) , goa cant miss the old box.

×
×
  • Create New...