Jump to content

AmithabaBuddha

Members
  • Posts

    694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AmithabaBuddha

  1. I think there will me be more goa influenced releases this year...

    We had the start of the fullon explosion 2003...

    2004 that was pure fullon

    2005 will be the end of the fullon explosion but still lots of fullon...

    in 2006 fullon won't be the mainstream in the psyscéne anymore imho....

     

    I think this year will be better....

    232510[/snapback]

    Full On Golden Age. :X

  2. Ahhhh that's awesome,

    I remember dling a song called zillion a while back, but I didn't know the name of the artist (all it said was Mach, but I'm not sure if that's a real person).  It was an awesome song, and now I see it in this CD.  If it's the same one I'm thinking about then the CD is really good.

    231649[/snapback]

    yea the same artist made music under the name of Mach so im pretty sure it was him. get this! B)

  3. Oh I see.. Sorry, I thought it's a new release. Just like Indoor's album Progressive Trance, nothing to do with today's Progressive meaning.

    I'll check it out tnx!  :)

    229815[/snapback]

    yea exactly , maybe the word progressive could be related to as goatrance is a music that progresses (evolutes) as long the song passes.

  4. I hope you don't mean:

    http://audiotests.batcave.net/article0001.htm

     

    Four tracks of dithered 16 bit files is not much of a test really.

     

    But the same people did another test that they unfortunally did not publish.

    This was the conclusion from that test though:

    Please stop going on about it all being about production skills.

    First compare for yourself on a quality monitoring system.

    Since you have not done that please don't bother to comment and try to establish your loose presumptions as fact.

     

    Sure one can make good music with fruity and decent sounding productions if you are a skilled producer.

    But the sound is inferior, there is really no point arguing about that, especially without actually having tried properly for yourself.

    229727[/snapback]

    yes it was that site thanks. :)
  5. cubase SX.

    A friend told me that neundo also has a good engine but didn't tested it yet myself.

     

    But i never compose in cubase.  Only render.

    I rewire fruity to cubase like you do with reason to fruity.

    229649[/snapback]

    Daniel some days ago i found an article about some research people that made some tests testing if cubase and fruity have different ways to sound , they just said purely that both sound the same. I´ll see if i can find that page again so that it can convince you.
  6. Just take this test:

     

    open fruity, make track, render, close fruity

    open cubase, add fruity as vst.

    open  fruitytrack you just made, rerender with cubase.

    close cubase

     

    And then just listen to the difference.

    If you want better sound you don't even need to change to cubase, all you need is the audio engine actually & you can still compose in fruity.

    Importing Fruity in cubase also gives you 20% extra CPU.

    229628[/snapback]

    which cubase you use?

×
×
  • Create New...