Children
-
Posts
679 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Children
-
-
Check out the "contest" forum ;-) This contest will probably lead to a 2nd compilation, and then we'll need a cover for it :-) But we still have not decided of the compilation name yet.
-
It's not as good as Cosmology (more psyche, less melodic), but I think it's better than Intergalactic (which is less psyche, less melodic than Cosmology). I rated it 7/10 some months ago, and trust me few CDs are rated 7/10 with my rating system :-)
The package is very nice. Even the CD has a very nice design, one of the most psyche CD design I've ever seen :-)
-
Well ... maximum May 1 for the votes :-)
-
Yes but you don't count when you love (dunno if that's the right translation) :-)
I bought it yesterday.
-
-
I've just seen 4-5 "Cosmosis : Synergy" albums at Fnac Champs-Elysées (26 Euros though), just to let you know ;-)
-
Not too much, a little more than 20 members.
Oops I already made the change but not on the .xls file I use by copy/paste at each update -> the mistake appeared again ... will fix it
-
Well that's normal, each year has at least 5 favourites highlighted which means :
1995-1999 = 5*5 = 25 highlighted releases
2000-2001 = 2*5 = 10 highlighted releases
Sometimes there are more than 5 highlighted releases for a same year (when the results are too close)
-
No prob Slidingtrancer, you can send me your TOP 10 fav tracks at children01@free.fr ;-)
But don't send it yet, the contest is about to be finished and there are still around 50 tracks to be added (some of them being very nice) :-)
-
Here are the tracks added :
Cyrillian March
Mologram 10'29" 140De-Fect
Rektangular Circles 08'13" 140Dr Avalance
Arachnophobia 06'01" 134E-Psylon21
Calima 08'02" 142Metaphasis
Crazy Ducks 08'31" 140Psychid Sun
Zero Turns 11'49" 143Titikn@r
Ironie Spectrale 07'02" 142TUG
Telekinetic Dreams 05'50" 140Unbalanced
Alive 12'06" 140My favourites here : De-Fect, Unbalanced.
-
Anyway a general opinion on each track (between more than 1 reviewer) could be precise enough, but once again who could make that ? There are around 200 tracks to review !
-
I personally could not ... and you know opinions on a track really depend on the reviewer taste. It's not rare to see some tracks I rated 3/10 which are rated 6/10 by some of the jury members, so the description of what is good and what is wrong in them would be very different between our 2 versions.
In case of someone wants to read some opinions about his track the best is still to ask that on the forum, like few guys already did.
-
Eclipse compilation (nearly as good as a Shpongle album), Ooze album :-)
-
I don't like Hux Flux stuff that much but the Live I saw some months ago was really good ! I think Hux Flux is much more enjoyable in a party than at home, which is not always true (Ex : Classical Mushroom).
-
Well VBR won't be disqualified, but, in case of there is an hesitation between a VBR and a NON-VBR track (ex : VBR ranked 19th, NON-VBR ranked 20th) then the NON-VBR will be the winner one.
-
I also think 96 Kbps stereo is enough to have an opinion about a track (good/average/bad)
-
Urrrgh indeed I already explained that ... briefly :
1) permits people with low bandwidth to dload more tracks
2) permits Inpsyde Media not to be afraid to release the future comp of winner tracks (-> "permits winners to be released by a label & become known in the scene via future DJ sets with their track & eventual bookings") as nobody will have the normal quality version of these tracks
3) takes less place on Aquagena's server
-
Forgot a point : the reduced jury member list will stay anonymous.
-
I think you resume well the situation, I don't think it's that important to make all people vote are we're not sure at all about the objectivity of these votes (IP cheating, people who ask their friends to vote for their track & so on). That's why we'll probably simply use this reduced jury.
Other point : yes we will check all the winners in order to be sure all songs selected are not awfully produced, and then decide, between all members of the jury & the site members if we have to make some slight changes in these results or not.
-
??? Agalactia can't be at 192 kbps, the only one I received is at 96 kbps.
-
Some tracks are not encoded at 96 ? Seems I've forgotten to decrease their quality to 96 so. Could you say me whose ones ?
-
Well "i hate this style" or "i have to buy i" only written on a review are not positive nore negative comments, the first one means "I hate minimal so I hate this album", which is not very objective, and "I have to buy it" can mean the reviewer still didn't listen to it. In both cases these reviews give no argumentation about why he hates or likes it (cause I suppose he didn't wrote anything else that these words in his review) . So why keep it ? Very useless.
-
Just send me a mail with your current TOP 10 (no particular order ;-))
I'll ask you your final TOP 10 on mid-april or sthing like that :-)
-
We can't guess who is friend of who, simply hope people are not as you say (I precise it when they enter in the jury, and of course they can't vote for their track if they made one). That's also why I'm not sure we'll ask all visitors to vote for their track on april 1, but maybe will only use the reduced jury, for the same reason you mention. That's why I'd like 30 members to be part of this jury, not only 19.
Artist looking for work..
in General Psytrance
Posted
You're wrong ;-)
Inpsyde Media will pay him as they did with Flow for the first comp package.
But he will have to win the upcoming cover contest for that, cause there will also be such a contest, as for the first Psychedelic Sparks upcoming comp :-)