Jump to content

Redo

Members
  • Posts

    153
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    12

Posts posted by Redo

  1. "The first track was absolute shit. The second track was absolute shit.

    Why would anyone care if this person keeps releasing the same shit with different titles? No one should be listening to this person regardless..."

    A few people on this board thought his debut was album of the year.  You are right about one thing though, no one should be listening to this guy anymore.

     

    "They didn't sound the same to me.. The YouTube track sounded pretty good lots of bass. 

    I just think the music itself is very similar afterall it's forest. "

    It's the same exact song, skip to around 5 and half minutes and listen to the climax.

  2. Thanks for the definition, now look just a bit to the right on that website and find the definition of self-plagiarism.

    1 hour ago, Kriestof said:

    but this case of Goch is not plagiarism and is not illegal, an artist can release the same song under other names, since spotify it's happening more and more with acts and bands..the philisophy is that you have a bigger chanche to get attention to you band and recieve revenue, i've read an article about it in a music magazine, strategies to get more listens

     

    Not illegal sure, but how is it not plagiarism? Song's a literal copy-paste.

    That is wild, in the academic world this would get you into trouble, and in music they encourage it.

  3. 10 hours ago, Prana4ever said:

    Why do you call for plagiarism when the same artist made both tracks? Anything am I missing?

    Yea, missing just a few braincells.

    How would you feel if a band released the same songs every album and called it a new album and charged you twice for the same product?

    You're misleading people into thinking its a new song by changing the name.

×
×
  • Create New...